Hello, children of the dark. I’d like to spend just a few moments talking about the “no-no” section of our submission guidelines, and to explain why we’re carrying a content warning for some of today’s drabbles.
There is a constant debate swirling in horror circles about the usefulness of content and trigger warnings on stories. Those against them argue that horror is meant to be confronting; those for them argue that while that’s true, you also need to give people a chance to skip a story that might bring up harm from the past. I’m in the latter camp. I have read stories that have opened up massive wounds for me that I struggled to recover from, and I haven’t personally been subjected to violent trauma, so I can only imagine what it feels like to be in those shoes. By arguing against content warnings, you’re basically saying you don’t care about your readers, which seems to be antithetic to putting your work out there for others to enjoy.
Fear not, horror bros – we’re not going to start demanding trigger warnings on your submissions any time soon (I don’t think!). But we have decided to place a warning on two of our drabbles this week for reasons I go into below. This is mainly because we, as a team, debated whether those pieces were against our submission guidelines, and decided they were borderline but with incredibly strong writing, so we accepted them, explaining our thinking to each writer.
We have submission guidelines with a “none of this” section because we know our audience – just like every publisher out there knows their audience. The average Horror Tree reader does not come here for erotica, graphic sex, rape, racism, homophobia, transphobia, misogyny or misandry. We personally, as editors and publishers, do not want to read about killing, torture or abuse of kids or pets – and that’s our prerogative, as publishers and editors, to state that preference. That doesn’t mean we don’t agree that horror can be cathartic, confronting, life-changing. What it does mean is, if you submit something to us that’s against our guidelines, we will reject it. There are plenty of horror outlets online these days, and some of them even specialise in the extreme, the splatter, the gore, the violence. You will find a much better home, and better reception, for your work with them.
Now let’s turn to this week’s menu. For our Trembling main course, Martin Fuller gets inside the head of some daters with very particular tastes. This is followed by three delicious quick bites:
- Robyn O’Sullivan faces violent torment,
- Deborah Sheldon remembers a childhood incident, and
- Ron Capshaw plays around with some monster tropes.
Please note this week’s menu comes with a content warning for the drabbles: Robyn’s piece concerns domestic violence, and Deborah’s piece concerns child harm. As a team, we debated these pieces as we have submission guidelines for a reason, but felt the writing was too strong to ignore, and the treatment of the subject did not glorify the action. If these topics are potentially triggering for you, I suggest skipping to the end of the drabbles for some vampire-based light relief.
Over to you, Stuart.